Battle: LA
Title: Battle: LA
Rating: 1.5/5
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi
Starring: Aaron Eckhart, Michelle Rodriguez
Director: Jonathan Liebesman
The staff sergeant ends up resuming command and tells them to leg it to a forward base only to arrive and discover they all died. Here he decides to have bromance with a guy whose brother died under his command on his last tour, which once again is pretty much limited to “you don't know where I been man, you don't know!” which naturally means, we don't know either. There's a couple of scenes of kids looking scared and crying, and by this point I'm hoping the little brats get shot so we can be done with it already, and then they all fly off before jumping off the heli so they can take down a 'command centre' controlling the drones in the air. Turns out it's underground and the monstrosity must have been constructed during the invasion because the land around it is still perfectly intact, at least until it takes off. Which is a little strange. If you had an important military asset that was inherently mobile, wouldn't you kinda move it so the enemy didn't know where it was? Or at the least, not leave it slap bang in the
The first footage of the invasion we see looks like it was shot by an iPhone. Worse, in fact. Anyone remember those games like C&C in the mid-90s that used VGA video debriefing? In fact, here, this kind of thing (Note: I'm not referring to the computer graphics but the TV shows in between). Now imagine they can't hold the camera still. Fortunately the effects do get better after this; lots of stuff burning for no reason and lots of pyrotechnics are on display, and occasionally we get a half decent look at the dodgy aliens, usually through a dirty rifle lens, and at one point, we even get a nice dissection which looks like it came from some sort of B-Movie where they simply shoved various balloons of coloured goo into a box and told the actors to poke it with a stick. I must confess however, the sets themselves are possibly the only element I have no argument against. They were done surprisingly well. My guess is someone pointed out that some of the budget should be used elsewhere, and not on items that weren't whores or beer, so they hired a guy to take a case of beer and plant a lot of explosives around the set to be detonated at random times. You ever see a machine gun make a bridge explode? How about a guy who gets shot in the head, goes “ow,” rubs it a little bit, and then spontaneously loses his sight and needs to be helped around? Yes this film has it all, and pieces it all together with editing that means injuries appear from nowhere and characters mysteriously die without you even noticing.
The music was some of the most generic melodramatic drivel I can recall and the acting was non existent. The fact that nothing made any sense made it all the more difficult for the actors to actually act; when the entire cast list was made up of various red-shirt wearing Ensigns from Star Trek; where their only purpose was to run around like a headless chicken and then die, well it doesn't really give them an awful lot to work with. It isn't exactly helped by the fact that 90% of the dialogue is four cliché riddled words or less, with a couple of cheesy speeches tossed in for good measure. Even calling this “Science Fiction” sounds a little dirty as it implies that some scientific thought went intro the proceedings when creating aliens with a dozen or so organs that serve no purpose in their body, invade by landing in all the major cities which all happen to be in the US, except for some bizarre reason Ireland - because that's clearly where one of the world's biggest threats are – all for absolutely no reason other than because we have water in liquid form and they're technologically advanced but haven't yet learnt about solids, liquids and gasses yet. This only gets worse when the term 'fiction' is added, as it gives off the impression that somewhere, at some point, something resembling a story might actually emerge. Spoiler alert: It doesn't.
Comments
Post a Comment