Stalker
Title: Stalker
Rating: 4.5/5
Genre: Sci-Fi, Mystery, Drama
Starring: Aleksandr Kaidanovsky, Anatoli Solonitsyn, Nikolai Grinko
Director: Andrei Tarkovsky
Language: Russian
The tale follows the path taken by our Stalker as he leads a small group of people, to the infamous and semi-mythical place known only as 'The Room.' Deep in the heart of the Zone, a place that is rumoured to have been created by a meteorite but for all the talk of advanced alien technology the mystery of how it came to be is never unveiled, it promises to give anyone who enters their deepest and innermost wish in the near future, but approaching this miracle room is not a straight-forward affair. Indeed, you cannot simply walk on up to the room for the short journey is full of traps and pitfalls; invisible 'portals' that send you in circles, small isolated patches of violent wind and other more inherently dangerous traps that can only be imagined. It is for this reason that the Stalker is hired as a guide to carefully traverse the land he has come to learn and respect, giving the last chance of hope to those who have nothing left.
It is through the eyes of these three characters that we get involved in the deep metaphysical philosophy; the nature of your inner desires and whether we genuinely know what we want to wish for, and even if we did, whether we would even have the foresight to realise that such a wish is unlikely to grant us happiness in the long term. It is, as the film describes, a place for the wretched with no hope. The long shots into the dead eyes of our main protagonist as he desperately seeks to help someone and prove his life has some form of worth, and he isn't the only one without any sense of hope. These three are already dead, and it's only the promise of The Room that gives them any incentive to continue on. The problems arise from just how long it spends in divulging these sequences; this is minimalist beyond minimalism, and with such an weight on the little dialogue that is spoken a lot of it becomes lost in translation. There is so much to be explored but instead it poses the question and lets the viewer ponder upon it themselves; there's no exploration of the questions posed within the film itself, and this is pretty disappointing.
That's nothing against the view of the actual backdrop itself, or the cinematography which for all its pacing issues is rarely short of impressive. The manner the decaying ruins surround
Comments
Post a Comment