The Avengers
Title: The Avengers
Rating: 4/5
Genre: Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, Mark Ruffalo, Chris Hemsworth, Jeremy Renner, Tom Hiddleston
Director: Joss Whedon
The ride isn't a short one, but there are a lot of characters to fit into this film and it couldn't be done any other way. It's also commendable how quickly someone such as myself can come to grips with them all (excluding Hawkeye, I still don't really have a clue who he is apart from being an archer with good eyesight, Legolas with less hair);
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
There weren't quite as many quips as I'd have liked either, Iron Man (Downey Jr.) steals much of the screen time with the eccentric persona that made his own films so enjoyable to watch and whilst it felt there was a couple of missed opportunities, Thor (Hemsworth) got a few good lines about his brother and the 'pathetic humans' in there, the irony of a man protecting humanity whilst mocking them perhaps never quite used to it's full potential but present nonetheless. Black Widow (Johansson) gets a couple of moments too, and Hulk (Ruffalo) gets perhaps the biggest laugh compensating for his rather bland alter ego. Heading further down the ladder lies Fury (Jackson) and the lack of decent lines,
It's fortunate that despite all this negativity it truly works where it counts: the action. From the opening moments it's set piece after set piece, bordering on a sense of a 'beat 'em up' video game, pitting hero against hero one after the other and letting their abilities come to surface, showing the audience just what they can do and where their strengths lie. And when push finally comes to shove, and it's time for them all to work together and get past their personal differences, they all find themselves with roles to perform, tasks they are capable of doing better than any other; Hulk's strength and ability to cause chaos for the enemy, Iron Man's speed and agility coupled with Hawkeye's ability to act as a human radar, scouting the area for the rest to follow. It's not all random explosions and shaky camera's (though they do still feature heavily), the group behave as a team, fighting intelligently utilising one another for support, and that sense of camaraderie does not go amiss.
Nothing here feels as though it's re-inventing the wheel, it's a comic-based action film like all the rest; we are introduced to a threat, we poke at the flaws of our hero, they learn something and combine that knowledge with too much CGI to win, the lesson in this instance being how to play well with others. It's ultimately the same formula that the rest have adhered to, complete with the bloodless action and light tone to the proceedings. No doubt fans
You know what misogynistic means right? I don't think Iron Man is a misogynist, and I don't think that's part of his persona that makes his films enjoyable. Do you perhaps mean "playboy"? Quite an important distinction there!
ReplyDeleteOther than that, I mostly agree with you. It was fun, it was rammed full of plot holes (can a thing be full of holes when a hole is an absence of a thing? You know what I mean, though!), but it had moments of genuine fun. It didn't give me that "hell yeah!" air-punch feeling, like the first Iron Man, or the Star Trek reboot did, but I enjoyed it.
Plot holes that bugged me - why does Loki WANT the tesseract? What's his goal? And why does his plan after stealing it involve making The Hulk smash things. And why can Banner control the Hulk at the end? And how does Loki control Banner earlier on, for that matter? And why is the SHEILD HQ on an aircraft?!
Hawkeye has exploding high-tech arrows, which might explain why he does so well against the bad guys. And I suspect he'll get more screen time as we go on, so it doesn't matter if you don't know who he is, other than another agent of SHIELD.
I actually really liked Ruffalo as Banner - but maybe that's down to personal taste. I thought he made him seem interesting and did a good job of making him feel like the mild-mannered professor exterior was hiding a deep pit of rage.
Yah, I don't know why I typed misogynist instead of philanthropist - I was going by his own description and somehow the two words got interchanged :/
ReplyDeleteSwiss cheese is full of holes. Yes, I mentioned on fb that I thought Iron Man was better and I was constantly thinking of Loki "Eric Bana made a better bad guy." From my understanding Loki didn't want the tesseract, he wanted it only to trade with the aliens army, to conquer the earth so he can toss them the tesseract as a prize. But yah, a few moments made me go "hang on." I try not to really look for them but sometimes they make it hard to ignore. As for Ruffalo, he had his moments but the nerdy professor thing just felt a bit bland to me, particularly in that first half. I'd have rather seen him be almost an antithesis to Downey and see something come out of him that way, rather than just raffling off nonsense like that lecturer you never really paid attention to. Hawkeye grew on me though. I probably would see a film of him alone, but he definitely wasn't the worst there.
So Loki just wanted to stamp all over the Earth? Because his brother likes it? Doesn't seem a good enough motivation, but at least it makes slightly more sense...
ReplyDeleteI liked seeing Banner and Stark doing the "two smartest guys in any given room" thing. It was cool. Cap and Stark were also funny... some of their conflict seemed really contrived.
Did you see Thor? Hawkeye gets a teensy cameo as a SHIELD agent who says "I'm starting to root for this guy" as Thor is rampaging. I'd see a Hawkeye & Black Widow joint film - that could be good fun.
Yah, I actually wondered if I missed a Hawkeye/Widow flick. I've not exactly been closely following marvel's work; it does seem inevitable though.
ReplyDelete