Guilty of Romance
Title: Guilty of Romance
Rating: 3.5/5
Genre: Avant-Garde, Dark Drama, Horror, Sexploitation
Starring: Makoto Togashi, Megumi Kagurazaka
Director: Sion Sono
Language: Japanese
Make sense? No, I guessed it probably wouldn't; “Guilty of Romance” tells the story of one woman's brutal murder deep within the love hotel (a 'hotel' you pay for by the hour with the intention of having sex) district of Tokyo, and the events leading up to her inevitable demise. Surrounding it all is Izumi (Kagurazaka), a devoted wife to a famous novelist; his writings full of passion his home doesn't yield; her life guided by repetition and routine. Searching for something more, for a sense of romantic fulfilment that she doesn't receive at home, it isn't long before she's picked up by a talent scout for a nude modelling agency, an avenue that soon leads her to a greater sense of confidence and empowerment,* her new found sexual freedom leading
There is a horror element which certainly comes through in the use of lighting and locations, a darkened mood of the madness gripping some of our more thoroughly demonic characters but it doesn't emerge as some villain or physical entity but as an idea, and the power of this idea is surely enough to make some viewers squirm. It's the idea of unrelenting desire; of being so pushed and restrained that it can no longer be contained, emotions flowing out uncontrollably in an effigy that leaves little room for conscious thought but only raw, maddening neccessity for fulfilment in whatever manner is left available, regardless of how depraved it might be. It is through Mitsuko (Togashi) that perhaps this comes through most strongly; her twisted persona capable of switching between the respectable and despicable in a moment, seeming to allow her desires to be confined whilst her normal day resumes. Every character here feels a deep desire for something to fulfil their lives, though it may take the course of the film for you to fully realise what that might be.
I'm all for a film trying to take strides into new ground, of not focussing on a specific style but borrowing elements to suit the purposes of the film, but here it doesn't quite seem to do that. Yes, much of it does make sense, particularly as the final moments come to dawn; the foreshadowing of what came before slotting into place as only an intelligent author could place, repeating critical points for the audiences benefit, leaving little thought-
*Since many would be mortified at the implication that women modelling nude could be considered 'empowering,' let me clarify and say that this is simply the closest term I could come up with. It isn't quite accurate, rather it's depicted as a stark contrast to her normal routine and is liberating in that sense, allowing for her wilder side to be set free from the shackles of passionless and monotonous repetition.
Comments
Post a Comment